Inbox
Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in
11 Oct 2021, 11:57 (2 days ago)
to me
Dear Madam/Sir,
Your case has been scheduled for hearing in the Commission. Case details are given below:
1 File Number CIC/RAILB/A/2019/655480
2 Information Commissioner Dr. Amita Pandove
3 Hearing Date / Time 09-11-2021 11:30 AM
4 Hearing Venue N.I.C. District Centre, Collectorate Complex, District - Mirzapur-231001 (Uttar Pradesh)
5 Appellant Name Yogi M P Singh
6 Appellant Address Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh-231001
7 Public Authority Railway Board
8 CPIO details
1
CPIO Name : The Central Public Information Officer,
Venue Address : Scientist D, NIC, 4th Floor, F Wing, Kendriya Sadan, Koramangala, Bangalore, Karnataka - 560034
Your Case CIC/RAILB/A/2019/655480 has been scheduled for hearing on 09/11/2021 Time 11:30 AM .Please, click here to view hearing Notice
![]() | Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
Whether it is not mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 that arbitrary replies are made under it? 1 message |
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> | 1 October 2019 at 23:46 | |
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, msrrbbnc@gmail.com, rrbbnc46@gmail.com | ||
|
Cryptic denial of sought Information was made available by CPIO after 67 days but no violation of provision for F.A.A. & F.A.A. blindly overlooked the arbitrary denial of sought information.
ReplyDeleteReply of the CPIO -With reference to your RTI application cited above, It is advised that the details sought are grievance which do not come under the definition of information under RTI Act.
Decision of the FAA-With reference to your appeal cited above it is advised that, the initial RTI application dt. 09/06/2019 has been replied by APIO/RRB/Bangalore on 16/08/2019 and stands good. Hence, this appeal is disposed.