PIO must provide the following information point wise at the earliest as follows.
1- Action taken report on the aforementioned communication addressed to the Director General, Medical and Health Services, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow.
2- Provide the action taken details against chief medical officer Prayagraj Uttar Pradesh not cooperating the investigation by colluding with offender.
3- Provide the action taken details against Chief Medical Superintendent, Maharaja Chet Singh, District Hospital Gyanpur District Bhadohi not cooperating the investigation by colluding with offender.
Please provide 3 points information at the earliest within time as prescribed under subsection one of section 7 of The right to Information act 2005.
Your RTI Request filed successfully.
Please note down the following details for further references.
Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60633
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 26-10-2024
RTI Fee Received 10
Online Reference Number CPAEJXVYS9
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
Contact Details of Nodal Officer
Telephone Number 9415021746
Email-ID
Contact details of Public Information Officer
NAME: MUMTAZ AHMAD
Desinnation: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Phone No: 9151804317
Email Id : jansu-section.upic@up.gov.in
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60633
Date of Filing 26/10/2024
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Districts Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought A-20240901687
S02/A/1334/2024 Yogi M P Singh नाम :Joint Director Dr A K Shrivast,पता : Public Information Officer Office - Medical and Health Directorate,पिन कोड : 226001 30/09/2024 S-2
23/10/2024
Final order passed and case disposed of. Case has been disposed of.
Current Status
Case has been disposed of.
Hearing Room : S-2
Hearing Date : 2024-10-23
Public information officer in the office Uttar Pradesh state information commission must provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.
1- Please provide a copy of the notice issued regarding the hearing of the aforementioned case to the appellant.
2-Since in the aforementioned second appeal submitted by the appellant the case status is as Final order passed and case disposed of. Case has been disposed of..
Please provide the reason not to upload the order passed in the case on the website of the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission because when the information seeker searches it is displaying a message on the screen of computer no data is available.
3- Whether to upload the orders passed by the quasi judicial courts in the information commission on its website is not necessary. Please provide the govt orders, circular office memo which supports non upload of the orders of the quasi judicial codes on the website of the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission.
4- Please provide a copy of the order passed by the most respected presiding officer of the quasi judicial court in the aforementioned case.
5- Please provide the information whether the hearing in this case took place offline or online. This information must be available under your signature. Please also provide the reason not to conduct this hearing online by the commission. Please provide the copy of the link of online hearing sent on the email of the information seeker.
Public information officer in the office of Uttar Pradesh state Information Commission must provide the five points of information to the information seeker within a stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection one of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.
Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning, M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engg. Union (1971) 1 All ER 1148, observed: "The giving of reasons is one of the fundamentals of good administration." In Alexander Machinery (Dudley) Ltd. v. Crabtree 1974 ICR 120 (NIRC) it was observed: "Failure to give reasons amounts to denial of justice." "Reasons are live links between the mind of the decision-taker to the controversy in question and the decision or conclusion arrived at." Reasons substitute subjectivity by objectivity. The emphasis on recording reasons is that if the decision reveals the "inscrutable face of the sphinx", it can, by its silence, render it virtually impossible for the courts to perform their appellate function or exercise the power of judicial review in adjudging the validity of the decision. Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system; reasons at least sufficient to indicate an application of mind to the matter before court. Another rationale is that the affected party can know why the decision has gone against him. One of the salutary requirements of natural justice is spelling out reasons for the order made; in other words, a speaking-out. The "inscrutable face of the sphinx" is ordinarily incongruous with a judicial or quasi-judicial performance.
* Concerned PIO MUMTAZ AHMAD
Designation ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Phone No 9151804317
Email Id jansu-section.upic@up.gov.in
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
There is no transparency and accountability in the working of Uttar Pradesh state information commission. I think that there is Deep irregularity but it is confirmed that concerned accountable public staff will not take any action in the matter and even they will not provide any information.
ReplyDelete